VAR is not always perfect.  Scientists point out problems in football technology

The VAR system is truly revolutionary, and introducing it to the world of sports is without a doubt a great decision. However, it is not reliable in all respects.

The video validation feature has been in widespread use since 2018, and it allows referees to make decisions based on the frequency of plays. In this way, the referee – with the support of an ‘outside’ teammate – can see if the action involves a foul, by hand touching the ball, and even if the selected player is offside.

Read also: The spherical robot will hit the moon. What is Japanese layout?

And although, according to some, VAR technology kills the spirit of the game and even unnecessarily lengthens matches, there have also been studies that indicate that thanks to this solution, the number of offenses and yellow cards is reduced. Undoubtedly, the great advantage of this system is also the possibility of checking controversial actions, thanks to which the overall fairness of matches increases.

Pouya Sultani of the University of Bath led the VAR offside assessment team. Unfortunately, it’s not rosy here. The cameras were recording the player receiving the ball from a teammate who was observed from different angles using equipment such as Motion capture. At the same time, the system monitored the behavior of the ball and other players. The trial participants then had to rate the situations in which the flag should be raised and indicate the moment of administration.

VAR technology helps, but humans are not infallible

Soltani and colleagues found that, on average, participants chose to advance 132 milliseconds later than they actually did. They were the best at making judgments when the action was viewed at 0 and 90 degrees and virtual lines were applied to the “grass” (in this case, recording studios) to determine offside. According to the researchers, VAR resolution can be improved by using cameras that record at higher frame rates.

In addition, the scientists suggest that the virtual lines should be thicker, in order to remove the need to look for “millimeter” burns. The key to improving posture can be to increase the available angles through which actions are checked.

Read also: Artificial intelligence at the infant level. Unbelievable what I learned after 28 hours

At the same time, it is worth bearing in mind that the possibility of multi-assessment of a given situation is more fair for the players than the one in which the side referee has to make a binding decision in a split second. Besides, people nowadays still have an influence on judgments. Controversy can arise if AI has to choose from start to finish. Such a solution is also planned.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

COVID-19 pandemic. How do you protect yourself from corona virus and influenza? The Japanese patent office has published a half-mask patent, submitted by a scientist from the Institute of Biology of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences.

The Japanese Patent Office has published a patent for the invention of…

A plasma waterfall 100,000 km high? Such things only in the sun

The image of this unusual structure was captured by astrophotographer Eduardo Schaberger…

The material is stronger than steel. The way they are created is more fun

Something that will be resistant to damage and at the same time…

29 million light years from Earth. ‘Absolutely amazing’ what’s out there – o2

Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope, the world can see very…