Don’t expect miracles.  Shazam!  wrath of the gods

& lstrok; a & sacute; will not appear in & lstrok; Si & Yugon. The latest DC Universe movie. This is the next adventure of the superhero Shazam, who this time must fight back. measure cacute. with new opponents. How are you & eogon. The second part turns & sacute; ć It’s very similar to the movie four years ago.

attention: In the text & sacute; the & ago; Si & Yugon. Information about the plot of the film.

Part I &egon; ś ć “Shazama” was very successful. This is one of the few examples that & l & lstro; Superhero Cinema " It can still be & cacute; Interesting, especially for a younger viewer. Four years ago, & sacute; We got to the point where Billy Batson (Asher Angel), basically defeated Shazam (Zachary Levi), & lstrok; the main antagonist & egogon; This is Dr. Sivan (Mark Strong). Chł superhuman strength and share & lstrok; Si & Yugon. ne ogun; With her half-siblings & nacute;


Shazam: Wrath of the Gods - movie, review
Shazam continues to be & sacred; great personality & cacute; comic

In the second part & eogon; & sacute ;, which happens & eogon; Two years later, we found it working again. With their superpowers, they help & aogon; live & nacute; com philadelphia, save & aogon; them from car accidents. However, the time of their heroic performance passes and at some point they commit & aogon; b & lstrok; & ago; Dr.. Two masked figures stole & lstrok; from the museum with & lstrok; aman & aogon; stick and eogon. the magician (Djimon Hounsou), who – as si & eogon; Establishes – prevents the gods from entering the human world. Mysterious people are & aogon; Atlas’ daughters: Hespera (Helen Mirren) and Calypso (Lucy Liu), who are trying to recover and grieving; family and aogon. w&lstroke; sno & sacute; & cacute ;.

As in any other young adult film, over and over again we see our young heroes grow up. show & aogon. Si & Yugon. life dilemmas, some problems, and in general, in adults and life nothing can be acute; As & lstrok; In childhood & nothing. Work focuses & eogon. In showing not only the conflict between gods and superheroes, but also about minor misunderstandings within the group. Part II &egon; ś ć “Shazama” is more focused on the subject of puberty, as we see, for example, in the occasional elongated tails in scenes of conversations with superheroes. No wonder, because from the very beginning this production was a family cinema aimed at a global audience.


Shazam: Wrath of the Gods - movie, review
The movie is full of scenes in which the characters speak. about the difficulties of growing up

The big problem is the very predictable scenarioBecause & zdot. All the twists and turns are & aogon; Cliché and a bit surprising. I came to the conclusion that & zdot; Apart from a few small innovations, we get a movie almost like the first part & sacute; & cacute ;. Di & zdot; ni & aogon; Si & Yugon. only antagonists & sacute; Those who are here and aogon. Even less convincing than & zdot; Doctor Sivana. Atlas’s two eldest daughters didn’t impress me, and at times I felt like & lstro; Si & Yugon. z & sacute; mia & cacute; They look back on their skirmish with Shazam. Chc˛ Above all, you will destroy & cacute; bad guys and that’s where – sadly – it ends; Their theme (expanded a bit at the end). S˛ Very typical personalities, clearly standing out from the eyes of the “one”.

re-scenes & lstro; re & ago; work & aogon; skirmishes that have & aogon; diversify & cacute; Ocular and aogon. and feature & aogon. pages & eogon; film. I chose & cacute; see & aogon; look & ago; to sacrifice; & cacute. Interestingly enough, at some point I had a feeling of overindulgence and boredom. & lstro; I & lstro; m & zed; &zdo; s & zdo; “Shazam! Wrath of the Gods” suffers from the same thing as “Black Adam”, which overwhelms the viewer to act & eogon; discontinuous & aogon; Short dialogues. In such films, the most important thing is the thoughtful introduction of scenes that enliven the picture and attract the audience. And in the latest version of “Shazam” everything happens & eogon; Without much justification.


Shazam: Wrath of the Gods - movie, review
The other heroes are & aogon; only t & lstrok; o for Shazam

Without a doubt, its strongest point is the comedy elementswhich – you have to admit & cacute; – In the second part & s & aogon; ś s & ogon; at a decent level. At first we got some stale art, but later it became & zdot; Much better. key s & ogon . here & dot; Artful parts of Shazam itself, because & zdot; his g & lstrok; rugged & bag; & cacute. I & lstrok; clothes & nacute; cz & aogon; naive & holy; & sharp; ś Perfectly captured by Zachary Levi. This is exactly what you & eogon. I did not disappoint & lstro; But for a moment & lstro; I had the impression that & lstro; “Shazam! Wrath of the Gods is based on the recently released in cinemas ‘Ant-Man’. There are a lot of gags and funny scenes that have a ą dis & cacute; ambiance & eogon. – I always liked łm that kind of humor.

take & aogon; in mind & eogon; all & lstrok; o & sacute; & cacute ;, I can’t see & eogon; significant decrease in quality and liveliness; Compared to the first part & tail; tail & wise; But it’s also not & zdot; better. The sequel is only a small part of the original movie, tackling the well-known leads from “The One”. The humorous parts allow & aogon; draw & cacute; happy & sacute; ć of sorting, because basically, May & oagon; s & lstrok; u & zdot; y & cacute; Superhero Productions. Leaving the cinema, however, I had the impression that I had seen worse & lstroke & aogon; version &egon; the first part & eogon; ś.

The example displays &lstro; “Shazam” & cacute; This & zdot. moment of exhaustion and eogon. Certain conventions and styles of storytelling from the DC universe (this also applies to the MCU), because & dot; Creators cancel & aogon. Si & Yugon. To clichés and monotonous tricks. Would I recommend & lstrok; Shazam! Wrath of the gods? if & sacrifice; of & sacrificed; I love & lstrok; loved & eogon; “one” and wants to watch & cacute; A similar movie, it sure & sacute; ci & ogon; Part II &egon; ś ć mu & eogon; admire. As for me & tail; opi & eogon; , the production did not impress me &lstro; I am sure & zdo; I will forget & lstro; ś I watch like this & lstroke.

Rating: 6/10

Premiere in Poland: March 17, 2023 – Where to watch & cacute ;: Cinema – D & lstrok; ugo & sacute; ć film: 2 hours 10 minutes – He writes: Fiction – Guidance: David F. sandburg – Scenario: Henry Jayden, Chris Morgan, Bill Parker – It is happening: Grace Caroline Curie, Zachary Levi, Helen Mirren, Rachel Ziegler, Lucy Liu, Adam Brody, Meghan Good, Asher Angel, Jack Dylan Grazer, Marta Milanis, Djimon Hounsou, Diedrich Bader, Ross Butler, DJ Cotrona, Cooper Andrews Byrne, Hilary Harley, Jovan Armand.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

The House of the Dragon would not have happened without the stubbornness of George R. R. Martin

message Movies and series July 21 2022, 09:26 House of…

Deadpool & Wolverine – We know if Taylor Swift will appear in the movie. The new posters are pure trolling

marvel/screen rant Taylor Swift It will not appear in the movie Deadpool…

The best new Netflix movies worth watching

Here's the list of movies worth watching on Netflix. (Photo: press materials)…

Oppenheimer’s star in the MCU? Cillian Murphy may play the main antagonist

In the face of recent reports of disastrous interest in the final…