The Witcher, Season Two – Legitimate Hate or Problem for Bookkeepers?

An adaptation rarely has to have its own opinion and narrative. Fidelity to the material source word for word removes this moment of surprise in turn. The reader in the role of the viewer just waits for the known sequence of events to comment on the perception of the pages of the book.

The first season of the first foreign version of the TV series “White Wolf” received a lot of recognition. Filmed with the necessary political correctness and morality, it has the highest popularity of the streaming giant Netflix. Naturally, it starred over the Polish series with the infamous Dragon on its head, although I admit it was a more “home” project. Both mods recreated the content of the short story collections. Through thick and thin, what counts is the absolute sincerity of the readings. Hajberpola grew to an exorbitant size, with which the second volume of stories was expected to be released. This is also how it all starts with just a few visual changes. Other episodes, such as CD Projekt Games, follow the path of author independence, but they don’t completely abandon the book’s narrative. They add and mix facts, while trying to follow the order of the epic, even if they make the idea too superficial. In the eyes of people who are only aware of the principle of the inviolability of the author’s literary vision, the second season of The Witcher can omit from the beginning. Not necessary at all. And what about the creators? They have to stand up for themselves, sometimes spoiling the fruits of their creative labor.

Give me a penny?

Season 2 may have lacked something like the famous song “Toss a Coin to the Witcher/Gruza Give Wedmenwe” sung by the serial incarnation of Mr. Dandelion. In the midst of the crowds, the song was a huge hit, while social media was full of initiatives including a proposal for a Dandelion concert at Polish festivals. Well, were it not for the pandemic, perhaps dreams would not remain dreams. Global panic naturally affected the timing of the following season, but we were able to finish this project. A Grain of Truth, which opened the season, became a harbinger of transformations in the eyes of early viewers, when it was revealed that Cirilla had been added to the thread. Die-hard fan groups hit the show on the spot without taking any prisoners. Not only was it devoid of a more intense exchange of views, she was tweeting with Lauren S. Hissrich herself. However, before we get to where the devil says good night, it’s worth focusing on the arbitrary decisions of the film’s crew. Some are more courageous and logical, others are not. One interesting objection to the text is Geralt’s secondary treatment against the background of the ubiquitous feminine. I have a slightly different opinion, because in this regard, the season in which the Netflix witcher saga opens is coming in the future.

The lioness of feisty Sintra, Yennefer, Tessaya de Fries and Renfrey. All-female characters were likely to dominate the screen with an emphasis on the graduates of the Wizard’s Lodge. Episodes of season two show something like temporary loss and emotional dilemmas. Except for Elaine, who is cursed as Geralt’s replacement. It made sense to increase Ciri’s character-building exposure towards the will to control the Elder Blood Legacy. When we realize that the series is being viewed as another American fantasy show, we get used to it. The first season also had many shortcomings and deviations from the norm. Complete the story of characters who are temporarily absent from the stories content. The caller does the same, it is written with the same rules. It simply adds some facts that a fan of Mr. Andrzej’s saga will immediately reject. Despite the assurances of the author of the books himself about the quality of the series. Sapkowski no longer plays with content optimization, apparently green-lighting all changes in concept, as long as the name “The Witcher” is still profitable. Basically, he’s already done his job, so he’s entitled to do it. Another famous character’s plot, Eskel, became a surprising law. The public almost interrupted guidance for this shameful act.

Were those wooden in terms of plot? Well, a matter of taste. It would have been even more painful for Eskell to reach the third level, as if he wasn’t present in the pages of the saga. For some, a beloved play from Dziki Gon may be missing, too. Since The Witcher in the Hands of Netflix has broken its streak of compatibility with epic volumes, why not keep it up? There was no shortage of inspiration in the third match, and so was the blood of the elves. Geralt wore armor likely borrowed from blacksmiths with the CD Projekt emblem. Translations are always evidence of wrong decisions. It was Lauren S. Hesch is active in defending the case for her time. Every choice you make has its consequences. The series was still on the shoulders of Henry Cavill, not only in the field of acting, but of a moral nature. The situation with Eskel was aimed at developing the character of the white wolf, which Hissich painstakingly explained. The question is, why should a series creator based on a famous license explain to fans? This is a view independent of the epic. The mistake was made in the first season. When the pace of the work was kept almost in complete agreement with the short story collection. The deviation from the norm in season two naturally sparked a separate online storm season.

conflict of interest

The struggle for femininity is one side of the coin. I’m already used to exposing strong female characters, like these times. Since we’re staying with the feminine aura, I’ve decided to use the moment to interpret the Yennefer (Anna Chyalotra) series. Desperation to regain her magical powers prompts girlfriend Geralt to make a shameful decision, perhaps forever changing the romantic undertones of both heroes. Having fulfilled the stories of the first season, I consider this plot the second biggest mistake of the creators, although it also opens up new opportunities for development. Filming for the third season of the Netflix series, “Time of Contempt”, begins in March. After the last eight episodes, literary accuracy and fidelity are hard to find. The project has to go its own way. The question of Yennefer’s role as Cirella’s second mother is somewhat reminiscent of the Man of Steel painting. Henry Cavill faced criticism not for the impressive performance of the new Superman, but for the decision made in the final showdown when he had to commit suicide.

Doing something against Clark Kent’s superhero nature, and it had to do with the final match with General Zod. The question of choosing Yennefer serves a certain analogy here. Even worse than interfering with the content of events is to try to dissuade the written character of a particular character, especially the significance in the entire world of magic. I would also like to bring up the case of Wissemer, whose moments of serial doubt marked him as a reluctant leader. I swallowed the second season without major problems, changes in the plot of the saga did not interfere, although I studied the whole thing. The problem was the motives of the main characters. Except for Geralt. According to the literary prototype, he awakened the duty of the father to him. I am glad that the lady of times and places who is still young plays an increasingly important role. The predictions of lost moments in Sintra’s glory times also did its job. Feel on a bigger budget because of the cool postcards and the presence of monsters. He gives the green light for the third season, but he does not want to interfere with the main characters. I leave the rest in the hands of the same creators. Come here.